Powder
Coating Filter Saves Time & Money
Because of the high film builds
required for its parts, Smith-Blair sprays an average of 400 lb of
powder per day per booth. To keep quality high, the company has installed
a new powder coating filter
By John Walz
Manager, Powder Coating and Dust Collection Division
Chemco Inc.
 |
|
Pipe
joints are one of many products powder coated by Smith-Blair,
a leading manufacturer of pipe products for the worldwide
water, natural gas and oilpatch markets.
|
Smith-Blair, Inc. (a division of UK-based Invensys) manufactures
products used to join, repair and restrain all types of industrial
metal pipe. Chief among the companys specialties is pipe product
for the global water, natural gas and oilpatch markets.
The companys Texarkana, AK, facility specializes in water
pipe; other facilities are located in Uniontown, PA, and Orlando,
FL.
Smith-Blair Texarkana makes an extra-ordinary range of product.
According to production manager Charles Cross, Just about
everything from 0.75 to 50+ inches. The latter is used for
work environments that demand high salt spray and Holiday test ratings.
Equally extraordinary is the companys powder coating operation,
where film builds up to 16 mils are standard. And, the expectation
is that the powder finish will last 40 years or more. In the
pipe industry, said Mr. Cross, we dont do normal
powder coating. Specifications range from 4-5 mils to as high as
16 mils, which obviously puts an incredible amount of powder through
the booth and creates some unique challenges. A cold spray
technique is used for a few products, such as repair clamps, whose
build specifications are in the low (4-5 mils) range, but preheating
is used for all other products to prevent flaws from outgassing
and to facilitate consistency on the higher end of the build spectrum.
Smith-Blair operates three main powder booths, each with a 52-inch
high and 40-50-inch wide opening, and one spray-to-waste booth for
fast color changes. Production, according to Mr. Cross, typically
includes large and small couplings, generally 14,000-15,000
parts per day, plus some huge pipe sections and flanges. Its
a highly variable mix of product. The booths operate 9-10
hours per day, 6-7 days per week.
From the beginning, stated Mr. Cross, our big
challenge has been booth filtration. Specifically, filter
service life, which is confounded by the sheer quantity of the powder
in the booth. Each booth houses 13 guns, and powder consumption
can average 400 lb of powder per day, per booth. Two other factors
also contribute to the problem. These booths were engineered
by the OEM at a lower cfm than youd have if film builds were
more typical, explained Mr. Cross.
Also, theres a lot of heat to deal with. The powder
wants to float and you can get into problems with webbingwhere
overspray creates an effect that looks like baked-on spider webs.
In fact, the powder is partially cured as it contacts the heated
parts, and thats also true of the cartridges. So, these partially
cured particles end up in the filters, and if the filter isnt
designed for this type of application, blinding is the result.
The booth OEMs poly-filter does a good job, and it gives
us about 30 days in service. But its very expensive. My goal
has been to find one that would give us that performance and service
life, at an affordable cost. Since we converted from liquid to powder,
Ive tried out nine other filters. Eight of them, which seemed
all pretty similar, lasted in our booth either two or three days.
The ninth one, though, was a surprise.
The surprise was a new powder cartridge technology developed
by Chemco, Inc. Introduced
at Powder Coating 2000, the technology, marketed as Pulsator-Plus,
was engineered to perform at 99.9% efficiency at 2 microns. Its
media, a proprietary spunbonded polyester hybrid, has a service
life five to seven times longer than the cellulose cartridges its
often compared to.
 |
|
Product
enters one of three powder booths. Products are powder-coated
at up to 16 mils, which puts high amounts of powder though
the booth and demands exceptional filter performance.
|
Whats most compelling, however, is that it is made using
Advanced Dual DimplingTM, a manufacturing technique that imparts
a dual (opposed) dimpling feature on individual filter pleats. This
technique has the effect of increasing filter performance when the
filter is operating under high load conditions. It also optimizes
the efficiency of pulse cleaning and enhances filter capacity after
pulsing.
The pleats of the cartridges used in powder booths naturally pinch
at the top during operation, a phenomena which restricts airflow
and reduces the total effective filter surface area. The double
dimpling process prevents the pleats from compressing, so filtration
can occur across 100% of the surface area. This aspect of the filter
design also contributes to the cartridge being resistant to tearing
and collapsing.
One other important distinction Mr. Cross observed, Filter
pleats typically balloon to some extent during pulsing,
which traps powder at the bottom of the pleat. This dimpling process
apparently stiffens the filter media enough to prevent this unwanted
effect. The result is more effective cleaning.
The filters design uses unusually wide pleat spacing and allows
100% of the filter media to be used, since support bands, which
typically cover part of the media, are not needed on this new cartridge
design. As a result, stated Mr. Cross, the cartridge
has excellent release properties, and the powder retained within
the cartridge is minimaljust 3-7 lb per filter.
We found these cartridges let you back-pulse as low as 40
psi, proclaimed Mr. Cross, which probably saves half
the energy needed to supply compressed air to pulse clean the cartridges.
Theyre also quiet and very environmental because they can
be washed and re-used without reducing their effectiveness.
Mr. Cross has found the technology to be equal to the OEM cartridge,
with each capable of achieving target filtration result, and a service
life averaging 30 days or more. Most important, Mr. Cross has achieved
his cost savings goal. The Chemco cartridge saves Smith Blair $600
per changeoutmore than $7,000 per year. Honestly, too,
said Mr. Cross, my times importantand short. Its
worth at least again as much as the actual dollars we save.
I took it as a personal challenge when the booth people told
me their filter was top of the line and I wouldnt
be able to beat it. Well, we proved there was another filter that
could give us the 30-day life we wanted and not require more than
one cleaning of the final filter. Obviously, we like the ongoing
cost savings, and we think its also good for everyone that
the OEM now knows they arent the only game in town.
|
|