It's only water, so why does it take so long?
There are good reasons why aqueous cleaning technology does not provide fast, high-quality parts drying. The reasons relate to the differences in physical properties between water and other materials that do dry better.
Aqueous technology has become the most popular replacement technology for parts cleaning since the manufacture of ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) was banned. My independent surveys suggest that in mid-1995 around three-fourths of those surveyed are converting to aqueous technology compared to two-thirds at this time in 1994.
Suppliers tout (correctly, in many cases) that the proper aqueous cleaning agent and process can improve cleaning beyond that obtained from ODCs. End users like it because of familiarity and perceived environmental security. Regulators like it for the latter reason. So users must love it after they have converted to it, right? Well, not necessarily so.
End users' most common concern is that parts drying is seen as poor. That perception is generally correct. However, parts drying can be improved with aqueous cleaning technology.
A Misconception. It is not that drying water from parts is slow, inefficient or of poor quality; it is that drying is perceived to be slow, inefficient or poorly done compared to drying done with ODCs. If we did not have the benchmark of parts drying with CFC-113 or methyl chloroform (1,1,1 trichloroethane), we would not be disappointed.
Drying water from parts works as it always has worked. It has always been difficult to dry water from intricate sections, and evaporating water from metal surfaces has always left mineral deposits as cosmetic defects. It is not that aqueous cleaning technology has been oversold by its proponents; it is just that drying parts has not been mentioned because it was not an advantage of the technology.
The Perfect Drying Fluid. First decide how you want to dry parts. If you look in many dictionaries for synonyms for drying, the word evaporation is often given. So, parts drying is evaporating water from part surfaces. The perfect fluid for evaporative drying would have the characteristics shown in Table I. The table suggests the type of problems that occur when trying to dry water from parts, relative to production or maintenance lines designed for use with methyl chloroform. Some problems are as follows:
How to deal with an imperfect fluid. Table II shows some actions that will enhance the drying of water. The actions are organized around the disadvantages shown in Table I.
Those who dry parts without taking these (or similar) actions will seek to improve parts drying by using what I call the "bigger hammer" theory. This means that they compensate for the natural problems of drying parts by increasing air flow and temperature. This adds energy costs, and means the parts will be quite hot at the completion of the process.
The question you have to ask about aqueous cleaning technology (or any technology) is whether or not its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. For many, the advantages do outweigh the disadvantages. But for others, who value both high-quality cleaning and high-quality drying, other processes should be considered (co-solvent, chlorinated solvent, CO2).
When you choose a parts cleaning process, you must learn to live with its virtues and faults. Some processes are better for those who value parts drying; some are better for those who highly value parts cleaning.
Drying is the flaw of aqueous technology. This article has pointed out the reasons for this situation, and offered some suggestions that have been proven to improve the quality and amount of time required to dry parts.
|TABLE I--The Perfect Drying Fluid|
Perfect Drying Fluid
|Value for Methyl
|Value for Water|
|Evaporate quickly||High vapor pressure
at any temperature
|340 mm Hg @
|95 mm Hg @
|Takes little energy
|Low heat of
|102 Btu/lb||970 Btu/lb|
|Films of it won't
cling to complex surfaces
|Low surface tension||28 dynes/cm||72 dynes/cm|
|It drains easily from surfaces||Lower viscosity for
low frictional drag
Higher density to
|It has no non-volatile residue||No dissolved salts||None||Does the phrase
"hard water" have
|TABLE II--How to Enhance Drying of Water|
|Drying Problem||Methods of Overcoming
|Reason for Use of Method|
|Doesn't evaporate quickly||Consider use of another wash fluid to remove the aqueous cleaning agent, possibly a combustible organic liquid.||This liquid will evaporate more rapidly than water, but will add a VOC emission to the unit.|
|Takes lots of energy to evaporate||Decide what areas of the parts will be difficult to dry. Use second heater to overheat some of the air, and focus this air at the problem areas.||Only heat selected part areas as necessary to evaporate water on those areas.|
|Films of water cling to complex surfaces||Use focused high-velocity air jets to knock off films of water from the complex surfaces. Can be done by hand or automated.||Air velocity around 1,000 fps dislodges films of water, whereas a velocity of 100 fps evaporates some of the water.|
|Water doesn't drain easily from surfaces||Delay drying step for 30 to 90 sec. Use time to vibrate parts basket at 1-10 cycles/sec over rinse bath to maximize drainage.||It is much faster to "waste" 90 sec to drain the basket well, than to wait 5 min to vaporize the water or 10-15 min to heat the parts hot enough to vaporize the water.|
|Water has non-volatile residue||Rinse with mineral-free (deionized) water. This can add significant cost.
Use centrifugal dryerwhich doesn't dry parts by evaporation.
|The evaporated water has no mineral residue.
Water is "slung off" by centrifugal force, and the salts stay with the water.