PF Blog

Ask The Expert: Powder on Tri-Chrome Treatment

By: Rodger Talbert
28. February 2012

 

Q. We have been coating aluminum alloys for some time with inconsistent results as far as field performance of the coating. We had some corrosion and adhesion failure when our product was used in a harsh environment. Following your advice in an earlier inquiry, we are now having a tri-chrome pretreatment process being done at a local vendor on all of our aluminum castings. We considered bringing this process into our own shop, but it ended up not being feasible for us to do in-house. So far our performance is excellent.

My question is about one casting we have in particular on a new product. The current alloy is A413. This is a structural part, and we have seen failures in testing. Our casting vendor tells us A380 would be much more suitable as its strength properties are better. I also know that the copper content is much higher in the alloy. Do you see any issues in powder coating this alloy now that we are doing the tri-chrome pretreatment process? T.S.

A. Copper content in an aluminum alloy does influence performance, but it does not tell the whole story. With a single powder layer and standard cleaning method (clean, iron phosphate with fluoride) the 380 will not have as good corrosion resistance as the 413. With chrome it will be very close to the same. If you want more confidence you could prime the surface and then topcoat. That will perform very well.

To read more of Rodger Talbert's answers to questions, please visit the Powder Coating Clinic HERE

Comments are reviewed by moderators before they appear to ensure they meet Products Finishing’s submission guidelines.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Suppliers | Products | Experts | News | Articles | Calendar | Process Zones

The Voice of the Finishing Industry Since 1936 Copyright © Gardner Business Media, Inc. 2014

Subscribe | Advertise | Contact Us | All Rights Reserved