Published

Anodizing Clinic: Anodic Coating Blistering on 7075 Alloy

Q. We have recently run into a surface condition when hard anodizing 7075 machined forgings. It seems to be present primarily on the end of the part, even down into the hole. Both of these areas are machined. The condition does not appear to be evident on other surfaces. I have not seen this condition before, but it appears to me to be rather unique and something recognizable.

Share

 

 

Q. We have recently run into a surface condition when hard anodizing 7075 machined forgings. It seems to be present primarily on the end of the part, even down into the hole. Both of these areas are machined. The condition does not appear to be evident on other surfaces. I have not seen this condition before, but it appears to me to be rather unique and something recognizable.

Featured Content

A. I can see from the photos you sent that this is a condition commonly called blistering. It is sometimes baffling because it usually appears on one surface of the part but not others, and it varies from part to part. It can occur on one part in a batch of metal, or several parts. The questions about blistering on 7075 alloy have come up frequently of late, so I thought it would be a good idea to revisit the answer. A few years ago I posed this question to Dr. Judy Runge, a metallurgist who also happens to be well grounded in anodizing. Her response:

“Blistering in 7000 series alloys is often mistaken for hydrogen blistering. Aluminum is not susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement, except in extremely rare cases. 

Blistering occurs more frequently because the diffusion model of the anodic process shows that only aluminum is anodized, and the short-range structure that grows and develops into the anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) is comprised only of aluminum and oxygen. This leaves the other alloying elements behind, either entrained at the interface or jumping through the molecular holes in the anodic coating semiconductor structure into the electrolyte. 

Zinc, especially when it oxidizes, is too big to jump through the holes in the structure. It remains at the interface between the substrate and the AAO, and it oxidizes under the anodizing conditions as it sits at the interface. 

This creates a loosely adherent boundary between the anodic oxide and the aluminum substrate. It results in a naturally occurring stress point between the finish and the substrate, so now we have moist ‘gravel’ in the form of zinc oxide at the interface. 

Any subsequent thermal cycling may cause these areas to delaminate or blister. It can be that the blisters are simply not visible until after dyeing, that the process parameters of dyeing allow them to really develop. If a longer initial ramp period is used to get that zinc moving away from the interface early in the anodizing cycle, before the finish gets too thick, the occurrence of the phenomenon goes way down.”

I’ve learned more about the metallurgy of aluminum and what actually takes place as the alloying elements try to diffuse through the anodic coating as anodizing is taking place, and I believe that we finally have a viable explanation of how and why blistering can sometimes occur on high-zinc alloys. The root cause is the high amount of zinc in the 7075 alloy. The degree of blistering, or whether it even occurs or not, can certainly vary from batch to batch of metal. Since the zinc may not be evenly distributed throughout the metal substrate—because of differences in migration rate of the alloying elements during heat treat—some machined 7075 parts may have blistering and some may not. Some parts may have blistering on one surface but not another, such as in your case. Because the alloying elements—to put it simply—migrate through the aluminum-AAO interface at a different rate than the aluminum does, it appears that the best chance of reducing the occurrence of blistering is to use a very slow ramp rate (longer ramping period) when the current is first turned on. The faster the current is ramped up, the faster the aluminum migrates from the substrate to the anodic surface and the faster an anodic coating is built up. 

This can increase the chances of the alloying elements, especially zinc, to be “left behind,” or trapped at the interface. This causes that loosely attached anodic coating described above and increases the opportunities for subsequent delamination of the coating, perhaps caused by the stresses of thermal cycling in the dye or even the seal.

Try using a ramp period of at least 10 minutes and see what happens. If this reduces the occurrence of blistering, but does not completely eliminate it, try a 15-minute ramp to full current density and see if that helps. The bottom line is that there may be very little the anodizer can do. It’s the metal that is causing the problem and all the anodizer can do is try to ameliorate it. You can take that statement to your customer, if you like.

 

 


Originally published in the December 2016 issue. 

 

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Cleaning, Pretreatment to Meet Medical Specs ISO 13485 or FDA 21 CFR820

    Maximilian Kessler from SurTec explains new practices for industrial parts cleaning, metal pretreatment and decorative electroplating in the medical device industry.

  • What is the Correct Anodizing Specification?

    My company fabricates aluminum and steel pedestrian bridge railing among other bridge parts. We recently got an aluminum railing job that called for “Type I” anodizing per MIL-A-8625. There was no anodic coating thickness called out. We are not anodizers and we are at a loss as to how to write up a meaningful anodizing specification for this railing.

  • Anodizing for Bonding Applications in Aerospace

    Anodizing for pre-prep bonding bridges the gap between metallic and composite worlds, as it provides a superior surface in many applications on aluminum components for bonding to these composites.