Ask The Expert: Powder on Tri-Chrome Treatment
Q. Do you see any issues in powder coating A413 alloy now that we are doing the tri-chrome pretreatment process?
Q. We have been coating aluminum alloys for some time with inconsistent results as far as field performance of the coating. We had some corrosion and adhesion failure when our product was used in a harsh environment. Following your advice in an earlier inquiry, we are now having a tri-chrome pretreatment process being done at a local vendor on all of our aluminum castings. We considered bringing this process into our own shop, but it ended up not being feasible for us to do in-house. So far our performance is excellent.
My question is about one casting we have in particular on a new product. The current alloy is A413. This is a structural part, and we have seen failures in testing. Our casting vendor tells us A380 would be much more suitable as its strength properties are better. I also know that the copper content is much higher in the alloy. Do you see any issues in powder coating this alloy now that we are doing the tri-chrome pretreatment process? T.S.
A. Copper content in an aluminum alloy does influence performance, but it does not tell the whole story. With a single powder layer and standard cleaning method (clean, iron phosphate with fluoride) the 380 will not have as good corrosion resistance as the 413. With chrome it will be very close to the same. If you want more confidence you could prime the surface and then topcoat. That will perform very well.
What is right for the customer?
For more than 50 years, fluidized beds have been used to coat parts with powder coatings. In this article, two industry experts tackle some common questions about the fluidized bed process…
This alternative to TGIC-based polyester powder coatings offers similar performance and enhanced transfer efficiencies.