The Voice of the Finishing Industry since 1936

  • PF Youtube
  • PF Facebook
  • PF Twitter
  • PF LinkedIn
2/1/2018 | 1 MINUTE READ

Dielectric Testing to Determine Tank Leaks

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Goad CEO Curtis Goad suggests using dielectric testing, more commonly known as “spark testing,” to detect pinholes in containment systems.

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Q. How do I detect leaks in my tanks or containment systems?

A. Given the focus on environmental regulations and safety, it is important to detect any leaks in containment tanks early—especially when they contain toxic materials, such as those used in surface finishing processes. Prompt detection allows for repair before there is extensive damage to the substrate or, worse, to the surrounding environment.

Dielectric testing, more commonly known as “spark testing” or “holiday testing,” is commonly used to detect pinholes in containment systems. A point source of voltage is applied across the lining; when it comes in contact with a void, it causes the current to ground with the conductive substrate and creates a spark.

For tank linings, high-voltage AC (plug-in) spark testing is commonly performed. The drawback to this method is that small handheld models may not be properly calibrated for use with thicker lining materials, and an unskilled operator can burn holes in the lining with the heat that is created from the resulting arc. AC spark testing also relies on the operator to visually identify a spark when a leak is detected. 

DC (battery-powered) spark testers, which require a ground cable in contact with the substrate, can adjust the test voltage to the lining thickness. When a circuit is created, signaling a leak, the DC spark tester sounds an audible and visual alarm, and a spark may be seen. Upon creation of the circuit, newer DC models instantly drop the voltage, preventing potential damage to the lining. DC spark testers have been proven to find pinhole and capillary leaks in tank linings that AC spark testers miss.  

Full-tank leak detection also is an option. By installing a rigid box liner over a steel-lined or plastic tank, and allowing for a space between the bottom of the liner and the bottom of the steel-lined or plastic tank, a periodic full-tank leak check can be performed utilizing a low-voltage electric current meter. This device measures the circuit, if any, between the solution contained in the inner tank liner and water that fills the space between the inner liner and outer lined tank.

If a leak in the liner is detected, it is contained in the outer tank. During scheduled downtime, the tank can be emptied, and the inner liner can be repaired or replaced. 

Curtis Goad is CEO of Goad Co. Visit goadco.com.

RELATED CONTENT

  • ELV, WEE, RoHS and Hex-Chrome Testing

    What you need to know about testing your plated parts

  • EN-Boron Coatings Take Shine Off Hard Chrome

    In the search for the “next best thing,” some platers are turning to an electroless nickel bath with boron, often with remarkable success and outstanding results. Thus, the reintroduction of NiB as a cost-effective Chrome replacement.

  • Treating Plating Wastewater

    Wastewater from plating facilities contains contaminants such as heavy metals, oil and grease and suspended solids at levels that might be considered environmentally hazardous . . .


Related Topics

Resources