Manufacturing a Policy in DC
PF Digital Dispatch
ne of the most talked-about items at the NASF Washington Forum recently was the lack of a U.S. ‘Manufacturing Policy,’ essentially a plan to rebound from our country’s most recent economic blahs through a revitalization of the manufacturing sector.
#nasf
One of the most talked-about items at the NASF Washington Forum recently was the lack of a U.S. ‘Manufacturing Policy,’ essentially a plan to rebound from our country’s most recent economic blahs through a revitalization of the manufacturing sector.
Those in the surface finishing industry — especially those who have survived the most recent sluggish economy — know how important a robust manufacturing sector is to the U.S.
Talk of a more focused manufacturing policy isn’t new, but has picked up steam. In June of 2009, Jeff Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, called on the U.S. to increase its manufacturing base employment to 20% of the entire workforce, saying that that the U.S. has outsourced way too much and that we shouldn’t rely on the financial sector and consumer spending to bring us out of the doldrums.
But as Capital Hill twiddles its thumbs on helping small businesses and manufacturers, the numbers appear to be good for the sector, despite the lack of help from Congress. In April, the U.S. manufacturing sector grew at its fastest pace in almost six years. In fact, it was at a rate that was above expectations, and represented a ninth straight month of gains.
The Institute for Supply Management said its index of national factory activity rose to 60.4 in April from 59.6 in March, with the headline index at its highest since June 2004. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the sector.
Still, from what we heard at the NASF Washington Forum, much help is still needed from Congress to get serious about helping the manufacturing sector by developing a policy that gets everyone on the same page, and hopefully gets people back to work.
RELATED CONTENT
-
Cyanide-Free Electroplating of Cu-Sn Alloys
This paper is a peer-reviewed and edited version of a presentation delivered at NASF SUR/FIN 2012 in Las Vegas, Nev., on June 13, 2012.
-
Development of a Sustainability Metrics System and a Technical Solution Method for Sustainable Metal Finishing: AESF Research Project #R-121, 6th Quarterly Report
The NASF Research Board has funded a research grant at Wayne State University on sustainability in the surface finishing industry, under the direction of Professor Yinlun Huang. The objective of the work is to create a surface-finishing-specific sustainability metrics system to measure economic, environmental and social sustainability. In this report, a benchmarking study of five plants was undertaken to illustrate how the sustainability assessment works.
-
Plastics and Plating on Plastics [1944]
This republished 1944 AES convention paper presents an historic perspective of the early days of plastics in surface finishing - using them and plating on them, in the waning years of World War II. The discussion reviews the uses of plastics in plating equipment and processing at that time, as well as the coating of the plastics themselves, with accompanying application photos. You will note that today’s conventional plating-on-plastics processes lay far in the future. Surprisingly, CVD processes are discussed.