More on Anodizing Die-Cast Aluminum Alloys
The anodized parts are a dark gray color. In addition, we perform a salt spray test and the parts show corrosion pitting over more than 10% of the test panel after only 72 hr. Do you know if this is normal?
Q: We are anodizing (Type II) components that are made of alloy ADC12, which is equivalent to EN46100. Briefly, the process is shot blast, rinse, rinse, DI rinse, anodize 10–11 Vdc for 20 min at 200 g/L sulfuric acid and temperature of 14–18°C (57–64°F), rinse, rinse, DI rinse, DI rinse, room -temperature nickel fluoride seal for 15 min, rinse, air dry.
The anodized parts are a dark gray color. In addition, we perform a salt spray test and the parts show corrosion pitting over more than 10% of the test panel after only 72 hr. Do you know if this is normal? F.R.
A: The alloy you are using is high in silicon— 10.5–13.5% Si. Most die-cast alloys are high in silicon with the exception of the Aluminum Association designated 200 series alloys. Silicon is not soluble in the aluminum matrix and does not anodize. So with high-silicon alloys (usually above 7 or 8% silicon) the anodizing can result in a brownish gray or black, sometimes “sooty” appearance. This depends on both the chemistry of the alloy and the quality of the die casting. In some cases the anodic coating may not be dense or continuous and thus may cause failed salt spray tests.
Added silicon enhances the casting characteristics of the alloy. Unfortunately, it is a detriment to anodizing. One solution is to use an alloy that is as low as possible in silicon—certainly less than 7%, and lower if possible. Another method that might be used is called “modification” of the alloy. I’m not a metallurgist, so I’ll quote from a reference on casting alloys.
“Aluminum-silicon alloys have a special problem. Since a negligible amount of silicon is soluble in aluminum, the silicon forms a mixture with aluminum called the aluminum-silicon eutectic. In this mixture the silicon crystals are coarse, hard, plate-like particles and can grow relatively large. Also, large particles promote uneven distribution of the eutectic phase. The result of all of this can be unsound metal and a blotchy, sooty appearance after anodizing. The crystal size and distribution of the silicon can be controlled by the addition of such elements as sodium and strontium. The result of such additions is to convert the eutectic mixture containing coarse silicon flakes into a finely dispersed mixture. This treatment is called ‘modification.’ The finely divided and dispersed silicon promotes better ‘feeding’ of the alloy and a sounder metal structure is obtained. The appearance and quality of subsequent surface finishes are greatly enhanced by ‘modifying’ aluminum-silicon alloys. This treatment is accomplished during the melting operation.”
So, the quality of the anodizing will be determined primarily by the amount of silicon in the alloy, what (if any) “modification” has been done and the quality of the casting. I don’t find anything wrong with your anodizing process. Low voltage is good, but you may get slightly better results if you use a higher anodizing bath temperature. Try using 22–24°C (72–75°F). You are probably rinsing excessively. That certainly doesn’t hurt, but some of the rinsing steps could perhaps be eliminated. Also, you stated your DI water rinses vary in quality from 300–500 ppm total dissolved solids (TDS). There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not call water with this level of TDS DI water. The minimum-quality DI water that should be used in the anodizing process has 200,000 ? resistance (5 µ-Siemens specific conductivity). This is equivalent to approximately 2 ppm TDS. Water with 500 ppm TDS is equivalent to 1,000 ? resistivity.
Related Content
Understanding PEO Coatings
Using high-speed cameras and back side illumination (BSI) sensor technology to analyze plasma electrolytic oxidation.
Read MoreChicago-Based Anodizer Doubles Capacity, Enhancing Technology
Chicago Anodizing Company recently completed a major renovation, increasing its capacity for hardcoat anodizing and Type II anodizing.
Read MoreTrivalent Chrome Overview
As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.
Read MoreBryan Leiker, MFACA, Discusses CARB Public Hearing Over Calif. Hex Chrome Ban
Bryan Leiker, executive director, Metal Finishing Association of California, offers a recap of a January 27, 2023, public hearing conducted by the California Air Resources Board prior to an impending ruling on a proposed ban of hexavalent chromium use for finishing operations in the state.
Read MoreRead Next
Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining
Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.
Read MoreEpisode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read MoreA ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read More