Nickel Regulation and NASF Action

The NASF continues to work closely on advocacy efforts to ensure that U.S. and global regulatory bodies make responsible and scientifically-informed decisions on materials uses for a range of coatings processes.
#plating #nasf #regulation


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon


The NASF continues to work closely on advocacy efforts to ensure that US and global regulatory bodies make responsible and scientifically-informed decisions on materials uses for a range of coatings processes. One way the association has advanced the industry’s position is through its Strategic Partnership with the Nickel Institute.
Closer collaboration between the two organizations as well as with European-based plating organizations has assisted in impacting decisions that ultimately get picked up the U.S., either through regulation or through procurement policies by global OEMs that impact the entire supply chain regardless of geography.
As the European Union has reviewed stricter hazard classifications and restrictions or bans on nickel compounds, U.S. regulators at EPA, OSHA and some states have also considered changes to existing requirements or ratcheted down standards.
The good news on the nickel front is that NASF’s collaboration with the Nickel Institute and other European plating and finishing associations has resulted in a decision to delay the European Union’s consideration of restrictions for key nickel compounds used in plating.
Emerging Review of Nickel Compounds for Finishing
Recently, ANSES (anses.fr), the French regulatory agency responsible for environment and occupational safety, in lieu of formally nominating nickel compounds for restrictions under REACH, has undertaken an analysis of so-called “Risk Management Options (RMO)” for a selected number of nickel containing chemicals. ANSES had been mandated by the French Ministry of Environment (REACH Competent Authorities) to perform a RMO analysis on 12 nickel containing chemicals.
In addition to needing various information on hazard, emission and exposure data for nickel compounds for surface finishing, the French government and other interested agencies also required an analysis of uses and a detailed evaluation of volumes used in various sectors. This analysis is intended to fill in data gaps and inform discussions on the impacts of banning or restricting nickel compounds in plating.
NASF Resources and Tools Will Inform the Review
In addition to informing the U.S. and European discussions of nickel with key diagrams of nickel coating uses in automotive, aerospace and now mobile phones, the NASF just completed a joint report with the Nickel Institute that provided important data to analyze the mass flow of nickel compounds in finishing. A copy of the report is available for NASF members by contacting Christian Richter at crichter@thepolicygroup.com. Future reports to educate decision makers in the U.S. and Canada will be underway in the coming year as well.
For the preparation of the report, the NASF thanks its key author, Dr. Keith Legg of Rowan Technology, along with critical participation and technical contributions from NASF Supplier Members Atotech (Bill Krenz), Coventya (Brad Durkin), Enthone (Brian DeWald) and MacDermid (Mike Barnstead).
Next Steps
Among the next steps in the RMO process will be to continue answering the technical questions of the ANSES and to fill in the remaining data gaps for two key substances (Nickel oxide and Nickel sulphate) which have been formally selected for an RMO analysis in 2013. Depending on the outcome of the exercise, the remaining nickel-containing chemicals listed in the introduction could also be reviewed by the ANSES in 2014.
The work is scheduled to be completed by end of 2013 and the French authorities plan to consult the different stakeholders, including environmental organizations and others, on the outcome of the RMO. The NASF will continue to be an important technical, scientific and policy resource in the collaboration.

National Association for Surface Finishing


  • Masking for Surface Finishing

    Masking is employed in most any metal finishing operation where only a specifically defined area of the surface of a part must be exposed to a process. Conversely, masking may be employed on a surface where treatment is either not required or must be avoided. This article covers the many aspects of masking for metal finishing, including applications, methods and the various types of masking employed.

  • Plating Q&A: Can you color stainless steel?

    Our expert, Art Kushner, says yes, you can color stainless steel, but it is not a process that is typically performed in a plating shop. Read more about his answer.

  • Aluminum Anodizing

    Types of anodizing, processes, equipment selection and tank construction.