On-Site Treatment or Off-Site Disposal
Can you provide information on a pH/precipitation system that will speed up the process of removing metals and patina chemicals from wastewater?
Q. We often apply oxidation patinas to metals then hand-rub them with water, using general purpose scouring pads to create highlight effects. The patinas are mostly cupric nitrate and others, and the metals are copper, zinc, pewter (tin), brass (copper and zinc) and bronze (copper and tin). We need to remove the metals and patina chemicals from the water sufficiently so that we can discharge it into the municipal sewer system. Currently, we capture the wastewater (1,000 gal per year maximum) and hold it for a year or more. I have heard of a pH/precipitation system that will speed up this process. Can you give me any information on this? D.B.
A. I am quite familiar with precipitation of the metals using pH adjustment followed by coagulant and/or polymer addition. There also are commercially available powders that can be added after pH adjustment; these powders contain coagulant, absorbent and polymer in one product.
You have two choices: batch treat wastewater on site, or store the wastewater and have it treated off site.
Due to your very small volume, I recommend batch treatment consisting of collection tank, conical bottom treatment tank with mixer, manual pH adjustment to about 9, chemical addition, clarification, and solids dewatering or filtration. When you add up the capital, operating, permitting, self-monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs for such a system and its discharge into your city’s sewer system, it likely will run you more than $5 per gal of wastewater generated.
An alternative to discharging to the sewer is to dispose of this wastewater off site at a cost of much less than $5 per gal. First, determine if this wastewater is an RCRA hazardous or non-hazardous waste. After mixing your holding tank very well, obtain a sample and analyze for pH, Toxicity Characteristic Leach Procedure (TCLP) – Metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver), copper, tin and zinc. If the pH is between 2 and 12.5 (refer to USEPA regulations 40CFR261.22) and the TCLP metals are below their maximum concentrations (refer to 40CFR261.24), then the waste is likely non-hazardous unless your state EPA also regulates copper, tin or zinc. If this waste is hazardous only because of pH, its pH can be adjusted without a hazardous waste permit under the “elementary neutralization” exemption of 40CFR264.1(g)(6) in order to render it non-hazardous. If it is a hazardous waste due to metals’ concentration(s), it will need to be stored and disposed of as a hazardous waste.
I cannot summarize the requirements for the storage of hazardous waste by generators; you can refer to USEPA regulations under 40CFR262, particularly 40CFR262.34. I believe the initial as well as ongoing costs to comply with these hazardous waste regulations will be less than those for discharge to sewer. If this waste is non-hazardous, the costs will be even significantly less.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 10th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the 10th quarter of work (April-June 2023). Here, we examine the effect of surface fluorination of Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation performance in terms of energy performance as well as formation of chlorate and perchlorate when chloride is present in the solution. The full paper on this work can be accessed and printed at short.pfonline.com/NASF24Feb2.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
