Reduced Ion Electroless Nickel
Published

Plating Clinic: Adhesion of Brush Plated Deposits

Q. How well does a brush-plated deposit adhere to the base metal?

Derek Vanek, Sifco Applied Surface Concepts

Share

Q. How well does a brush-plated deposit adhere to the base metal?

A. A good non-destructive test for evaluating the adhesion of electroplated deposits, unfortunately, is not available. All good tests at least partially destroy some of the deposit on the workpiece, even though there is excellent adhesion. This requires a reliance on some indirect and less-than-ideal tests. It has been found, however, that use of some or all of the following five test procedures assures, in a majority of the cases, adhesion sufficient to meet the demands of the application.

In longer production runs, random samples can be removed and destructively tested for adhesion. This, of course, is not practical in short runs, one of a kind jobs or on expensive parts.

Pre-qualification testing is useful in cases where sampling is not practical. For pre-qualification testing, plate a sample of the same base material. Simulate the actual job as closely as possible using the same procedures, solutions, cover materials and so on. Then, destructively test the sample. If the sample passes the test, it should give a relative assurance of good adhesion on the actual part.

Some of the best destructive tests that can be used in sampling or pre-qualification testing include the following:

Chisel, Knife and Scratch Test

If the deposit is sufficiently thick to permit the use of a chisel, adhesion is tested by forcing the chisel between the coating and basis metal. A hammer is usually used to apply the force. Thinner coatings are tested by substituting a knife or scalpel for the chisel and light tapping with a hammer may or may not be used. Very thin coatings may be tested by scratching through the coating to the base metal. After these tests, the test area is closely examined for lifting or peeling of the deposit at the base material to plating interface.

Grind and Saw Tests

Another good adhesion test is grinding an edge of the plated specimen with a grinding wheel with the direction of cutting from the base metal to the deposit. If adhesion is poor, the deposit is torn from the base. A hacksaw can be substituted for the grinder. It is important to saw in such a direction that a force is applied that tends to separate the coating from the base metal. Grinding and sawing tests are especially effective on hard or brittle deposits.

Bend Tests

When thin sections are available, bending the specimens can be a good indication of adhesion. Care should be taken that cracking of the deposit, because of brittleness, does not mean poor adhesion. The samples are either bent 180 degrees back-to-back, leaving the plating available for examination, or bent back and forth until the base material fractures. There should be no visual evidence after the bend test of plating separation from the base material. A sharp instrument should not be able to easily detach plating from the fracture area. 

Some non-destructive tests that can be used are:

Tape Test

A tape test may be used to determine if the plating has very poor adhesion. The test is run on a clean, dry surface by pressing a tape, with a strong adhesive, firmly onto the surface and then snapping-off the tape as fast as possible.

Visual Test

Harder metals, in average or high thicknesses, may be visually checked for adhesion. Stress-crack lifting will be seen when poor adhesion is obtained for rhodium deposits over 2.5 micron (0.0001 in.) and nickel, cobalt, chromium and palladium deposits over 25 micron (0.001 in.) thick.

Testing has been done to obtain quantitative numbers on the adhesion of selective brush-plated deposits. The tests were run in accordance with ASTM C633-01 (2008). The test involves:

  1. Plating the end faces of two 1-inch diameter rods
  2. Cementing the plated end faces together
  3. Pulling on the ends of the cemented rod in a tensile test machine

The high cost of obtaining quantitative data results in the electroplating field relying heavily on qualitative tests for adhesion. The better qualitative tests involve placing the plating-to-base material interface area under high stress and strain, then observing results at the interface area. QQ-N-290B of the Federal Specification for Nickel Plating demonstrates how adhesion tests are to be performed.

Assuming that base material is properly prepared, the adhesion (tested in accordance with ASTM C633-01) of a brush-plated deposit to commonly used base materials exceeds the strength of the cement and if qualitative evidence is required, several commonly accepted methods of testing, as noted above, are available to ensure the adhesion is sufficient to meet the demands of the application. 

Derek Vanek is the technical manager for Sifco; for more information, visit sifcoasc.com

Reduced Ion Electroless Nickel
Hitachi High-Tech FT200 series
FISCHERSCOPE® XAN® LIQUID ANALYZER
KCH Engineered Systems
Luster-On Products
In-Place Repairs for Canning Presses
Rectifiers for the Plating Industry
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters

Related Content

Electroplating

Trivalent Chrome Overview

As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.

Read More
editorial

Products Finishing Reveals 2024 Qualifying Top Shops

PF reveals the qualifying shops in its annual Top Shops Benchmarking Survey — a program designed to offer shops insights into their overall performance in the industry. 

Read More
basics

Zinc Electroplating

Choosing the best process for your operation.

Read More
regulation

An Interview With Bryan Leiker, Metal Finishers Association of California

Bryan Leiker, executive director for the Metal Finishers Association of California (MFACA), offers an update on actions to counter a proposed ban on hexavalent chromium plating and anodizing operations in the state.

Read More

Read Next

Sponsored

Delivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films

Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.

Read More
Parts Cleaning

A ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago

The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.   

Read More
workforce development

Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining

Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.

Read More
Fischer measurement technology