The Voice of the Finishing Industry since 1936

  • PF Youtube
  • PF Facebook
  • PF Twitter
  • PF LinkedIn
6/1/2019 | 3 MINUTE READ

Building Corrosion Control Facilities for Painting Military Aircraft

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

The U.S. government is experiencing a capacity issue for corrosion control maintenance for C-130 aircraft, but GFS’ Steve DellaSala explains how to get that business with a new system.

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Q: Our facility paints large aircraft, but we would like to get into more work involving larger U.S. military aircraft. What advice do you have for building new corrosion control facilities?

A: According to industry experts, the U.S. government is experiencing a capacity issue for corrosion control maintenance for C-130 and Gen-4 jet fighters such as F-15, F-16 and F-18. The facilities available to properly strip and repaint these aircraft cannot keep up with the demands for refinishing. Solutions to this backlog will likely involve private sector investors building new corrosion control facilities to manage the work.

When considering a new corrosion control facility for C-130 aircraft, it is helpful to understand new technologies available for paint booths that comply with the latest federal and local codes. Since the earliest C-130 corrosion control paint facilities were put into service, both technology and codes have evolved. Some of these technology and code advancements can provide operational cost savings throughout the life of the facility.

Filtration: There have been significant improvements in paint booth filtration technology and code requirements over the past five decades. This is especially important when painting C-130 and Gen-4 jet fighters as the primers that have been used contain hexavalent chromium, a carcinogenic compound. Health effects of exposure to hexavalent chromium include lung, nasal and sinus cancer; eye, nose and throat irritation; nasal septum ulcerations; skin irritation; and gastritis or ulcers. To ensure effective reduction of chromate particles escaping into the atmosphere, the paint booth’s filtration system must meet national safety standards. Enforced by the EPA, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities require the use of a compliant filtration system for their paint finishing operation. Advancements in filtration technology include NESHAP-compliant, three-stage filtration systems that can capture at least 99.7 percent of particles larger than 2 microns. The advantages of a three-stage design can be realized in operational costs, as the first- and second-stage filters are less costly filters and sequentially protect the third stage (and more expensive filters) from overspray. This reduces the need to change out costly filters, thereby saving long-term maintenance costs.

Airflow: Many of the older aircraft crossdraft paint booths that exist today in the U.S. were designed and built without recirculation and with an airflow rate of 100 feet per minute (fpm). Today, 75 fpm is more typical in booths of this size. This reduced airflow rate decreases the operational expense of the booth, while still providing a safe, efficient finishing environment. In addition to a reduced airflow rate, the design of the C-130 paint booth can decrease capital and operating expenses. Some manufactures design conformal aircraft paint booths to accommodate the shape of the aircraft that is painted in it, with higher ceilings over the taller parts of the aircraft. A conformal design decreases the paint booth cross-sectional area in the direction of the airflow, which deceases the overall airflow cubic feet per minute (CFM) of the booth. Mechanical equipment, including Air Make-Up Units (AMUs) and fans, can then be reduced in capacity. With advancements in monitoring for lower explosion limit (LEL) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), it is now much more common to see paint booths that recirculate about 75 to 80 percent of preconditioned, exhausted air back into the paint booth intake air system. These recirculation designs are less costly up front, as they also reduce the size of the mechanical equipment, such as AMUs. They also save on operational costs, as they do not require as much gas or electric heat; cooling from chilled water or electric-driven compressors; and ground water for humidification/dehumidification because most of the preconditioned air is reused instead of exhausted.

LED Lighting: There have also been improvements in Class I, Division 2 LED booth lighting. Upfront costs for LED lighting have reduced considerably from its early introduction. These light fixtures are now only a slight premium in cost compared to the entire budget for a paint booth. LED lighting offers the advantage of reduced operational and maintenance costs, as they are more energy efficient; give off a negligible amount of heat; do not degrade in performance over time; and do not require bulb changes as frequently as traditional fluorescent lighting.

If you are considering setting up a new corrosion control hangar for C-130 or Gen-4 jet fighters that includes paint booths, it is possible to save upfront and operational costs by taking advantage of new technologies and advancements in filtration, recirculation and lighting. The result will be a faster payback to your investment and higher quality finishes.

Steve DellaSala is a sales engineer in aerospace and defense for Global Finishing Solutions. Visit globalfinishing.com.

Related Topics

RELATED CONTENT


Resources