The Voice of the Finishing Industry since 1936

  • PF Youtube
  • PF Facebook
  • PF Twitter
  • PF LinkedIn
6/1/2019 | 2 MINUTE READ

Hardwood Line Changes Paradigm for Plating Small Parts

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Its prototype is a lithium ion battery-powered barrel with special gearing.

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

 

For over 85 years, Hardwood Line Manufacturing in Chicago, Illinois, has been constantly looking for better ways for metal finishers to reduce rejects and improve margins.

Recently, a barrel customer was experiencing a lot of rejects in their plating process for battery caps and asked Hardwood for help. The reject rate using traditional barrels was well over 40%. “Visually sorting the rejects is next to impossible when there are as many bad as good parts,” says Tony Lazaro, Hardwood Line president. “And we’re talking about millions of small, very thin caps.”

The philosophy of barrel plating is simple—keep tumbling parts until all of them meet specification and are completely plated. That process, however, is difficult with thin washers or battery caps because those parts tend to stick together. “Platers have problems breaking apart flat, thin parts. Because of their shape and the constant revolution at the same RPM, those parts seem to align and form chains,” Lazaro says. “When that happens, you just don’t get good plating because you need to expose all the surfaces of the part.”

High rejection rates result in a time-consuming sorting process—all at a high cost and low margin. What can platers do? According to Lazaro, many companies that plate thin washers or caps usually minimize load size, increase cylinder speed or add filler in order to try get the load to break apart, but the outcome is usually the same.

“It was only through trial-and-error that we stumbled upon an answer to part separation,” Lazaro says with each change resulting in only incremental improvement. It was only when they put all the changes together that they were able to fully eliminate rejects.

The first step was the addition of breaker bars to the existing cylinder. Breaker bars, by design, lift and drop parts, but that didn’t do much.

The next change was to replace the cylinder with an oscillating plating barrel which, by design, forces parts to move in a figure eight path. That dropped the reject rate slightly, but it still wasn’t good enough.

For the ‚Äčthird—and perhaps most critical change—Hardwood Lines head engineer Frank Pusateri came up with an idea to mechanically force the cylinder to jump during each rotation. This was accomplished by replacing the traditional idler gear with compound or Nautilus gearing so that each revolution would include a snap that would create enough turbulence to kick the parts away from each other. “It’s the kick that differentiates it from a traditional, constant-speed cylinder,” Lazaro says, “and it was the kick that broke them apart.”

The compound gear greatly improved the process, but the customer still wasn’t happy. They asked for one last tweak. Could Hardwood speed up the barrel rotation? Hardwood responded by doubling the motor speed and the result was zero rejects. “The trial-and-error approach works, especially when you stick with it and have a customer willing to put in the time and effort,” Lazaro says.

 

 

 

Related Topics

Resources