PF Blog

PPG Chromate-Free Primer, Pretreatment on Boeing Next-Generation 737, and VIDEO

By: Tim Pennington 22. February 2012

 

A chromate-free metal pretreatment and a chromate-free exterior decorative primer from PPG Industries’ aerospace coatings group are now standard on Boeing Next-Generation 737 production airplanes, PPG says.

 

Desogel EAP-9 metal pretreatment and Desoprime CF/CA 7502 epoxy primer by PPG Aerospace is being used on qualified topcoats on Boeing Next-Generation 737 airplanes.
 
Kevin Brooks, PPG Aerospace global segment manager for original-equipment coatings said airlines are also requesting primers with a non-chromated pretreatment for Boeing 767 and 777 widebodies.
 

Watch the Boeing 737 being built:

 


Ask An Expert: Blistering of Anodic Coating on 7075 Alloy

By: Larry Chesterfield 20. February 2012

 

Q. We are facing a blister problem on 7075 alloy inside the bore diameter of our cylinder base. We noticed that this problem is occurring during dyeing process and not after hard anodizing. Can you please advise us what could be the reason? S.C.

 

A. There are several theories on why this happens. For many years I thought the problem might relate to so-called “hydrogen embrittlement,” but I have come to change my opinion recently. I posed this question to a colleague who is a PhD metallurgist and who also happens to be well grounded in anodizing. Here is what she said:

 

“Blistering in 7000 series alloys is often mistaken for hydrogen blistering. Aluminum is not susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement, except in extremely rare cases! Blistering occurs a lot more frequently and this is why:

 

The diffusion model of the anodic process shows that only aluminum is anodized, and the short-range structure that grows and develops into the AAO (anodic aluminum oxide) is composed only of aluminum and oxygen. This leaves the other alloying elements behind, either entrained at the interface, or jumping through the molecular holes in the anodic coating semiconductor structure into the electrolyte. Zinc, especially when it oxidizes, is too big to jump through the holes in the structure. It remains at the interface between the substrate and the AAO, and it oxidizes under the anodizing conditions as it sits at the interface. This creates a loosely adherent boundary between the anodic oxide and the aluminum substrate. It results in a naturally occurring stress point between the finish and the substrate, so now we have moist “gravel” in the form of zinc oxide at the interface. Any subsequent thermal cycling may cause these areas to delaminate or ‘blister.’ It can be that the blisters are simply not visible until after dyeing, that the process parameters of dyeing allow them to really develop. If a longer initial ramp period is used to get that zinc moving away from the interface early in the anodizing cycle, before the finish gets too thick, the occurrence of the phenomenon goes way down. Try ‘baking’ some parts at 150°C for an hour before anodizing to see if this makes the problem go away—it won’t—but if it were truly a hydrogen problem, it would.”

 

As I have learned more about the metallurgy of aluminum and what actually takes place as the alloying elements try to diffuse through the anodic coating as anodizing is taking place, I believe that finally we have a viable explanation of how and why blistering can sometimes occur on high zinc alloys. The root cause is the high amount of zinc in the 7075 alloy. The degree of blistering, or whether it even occurs or not, can certainly vary from batch to batch of metal. Since the zinc may not be perfectly evenly distributed throughout the metal substrate (due to differences in migration rate of the alloying elements during heat treat) some machined 7075 parts may have blistering and some may not. Some parts may have blistering on one surface but not another, such as in your case. Because the alloying elements, to put it simply, migrate through the aluminum-AAO interface at a different rate than the aluminum does, it appears that the best chance of reducing the occurrence of blistering is to use a very slow ramp rate (longer ramping period) when the current is first turned on. The faster the current is ramped up, the faster the aluminum migrates from the substrate to the anodic surface and the faster an anodic coating is built up. This can increase the chances of the alloying elements, especially zinc, to be “left behind,” or trapped at the interface. This causes that loosely attached anodic coating described above and increases the opportunities for subsequent delamination of the coating, due perhaps to the stresses of thermal cycling caused in the dye or even the seal.

 

Try using a ramp period of at least 10 minutes and see what happens. If this reduces the occurrence of blistering, but does not completely eliminate it, try a 15 minute ramp to full current density and see if that helps.

 

The bottom line is that there may be very little the anodizer can do. It's the metal that is causing the problem and all the anodizer can do is try to ameliorate it as best as possible. You can take that statement to your customer, if you like.


NASF Connecticut Chapter Holding Supplier Exhibition March 6

By: Tim Pennington 16. February 2012

 
The NASF Connecticut Branch will hold its annual Supplier Exhibition on Thursday, March 8 following its regular monthly meeting.  All proceeds at the event are used to sponsor the Connecticut Branch’s College Scholarship, which is given in November to a worthy son or daughter of a Connecticut Branch member.
 
Table space is limited to 16 possible exhibitors.  To make the event more attractive to potential exhibitors, the NASF chapter has a joint meeting the same evening with the Southern Connecticut Chapter of the American Society of Metallurgists, which typically more than doubles event attendance.
 
In addition, the NASF Connecticut Branch annual golf outing is Friday, June 8, with all profits funding the NASF Connecticut Branch’s College Scholarship program.
 
For more information on exhibiting or to take part in the golf outing, please contact Bill Nebiolo at bnebiolo@Remchem.com


Electronic Precision Specialties Wins 'Metal Finishing Model Shop Award'

By: Tim Pennington 14. February 2012

 
 
The California/EPA Department of Toxic Substances and Control has recognized Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc., with the "Metal Finishing Model Shop Award," only the fourth shop to receive the award.
 
This award is achieved through implementation of pollution prevention measures, including new technologies and strict compliance with environmental regulation. EPSI is one of only four companies in California to receive this recognition.
 
The City of Brea, which has been the location of EPSI since 1980, has also chosen to recognize the company for its achievement of 'Model Shop' status and its citizenship in voluntarily preventing pollution by facilitating a cleaner and safer shop.


ASK AN EXPERT: Corrision Resistance

By: Rodger Talbert 13. February 2012

 

Q. We need some reasonable corrosion protection for out parts, and our powder coating is failing in salt spray testing after nearly 300 hours. What should we change to enhance our salt spray results? B.P.

 

A. First, let’s be clear on the difference between salt spray results and corrosion resistance in field use. Salt spray is a measurement of how well the coating holds up in a salt spray cabinet. It cannot predict the real resistance to a particular environment. It is useful for comparison of different treatment and coating options, but it does not predict field life. If you need to understand the potential field life you should use some type of cyclic testing.

 

When a coating does not have good resistance in a corrosion test it can be from several different causes:

 

  • -The surface that the powder is applied to is not clean enough or lacks a sufficient conversion coating. For example, iron phosphate on steel with a single coat of powder will usually provide around 250 to 500 hours of salt spray resistance; zinc phosphate can increase that to between 500 and 1,000 hours; a primer coat and topcoat combination can give you well over 1,000 hours of salt spray.
  •  
  • -Your coating may not have very good performance properties. If you need corrosion resistance, be sure to let your powder supplier know it.
  •  
  • -The coating could be applied too thin. Be sure you have at least 3 mils of coating if you need corrosion resistance.
  •  
  • -The coating may be under-cured. Be sure that the film is fully cured.

 

If you have a satisfactory cleaning and pretreatment setup, a good powder, and good coverage at the necessary thickness you should be able to meet your salt spray requirements. 

 

Viw other answers to powder coating questions HERE




« Prev | | Next »

RSS RSS  |  Atom Atom


Suppliers | Products | Experts | News | Articles | Calendar | Process Zones

The Voice of the Finishing Industry Since 1936 © 2012 Gardner Publications, Inc

Subscribe | Advertise | Contact Us | All Rights Reserved