Chrome Reduction
What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water?
Q. What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water? K.O.
A. The “best way” depends upon many factors such as safety concerns, volume of wastewater, discharge limits and final discharge. That being said, our experience has been that, for the vast majority of chrome reduction applications, the use of sodium metabisulfite (MBS) is best.
Sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5), when added to water, forms sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3), which reacts with the hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) to form trivalent chromium (Cr+3) according to the following reaction:
3NaHSO3 + 2H2CrO4 >>> Cr2(SO4)3 + 3NaHSO4 + 5H2O.
Approximately 2.8 lbs of MBS and 1.5 lbs of sulfuric acid are needed to reduce 1 lb of hexavalent chrome. Because the speed of the reaction is pH-dependent (speed decreases as pH increases), we typically design for a retention time of 15–20 min and a pH of 2–2.5.
To feed the MBS solution into the rapidly mixed chrome reduction tank, an oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) sensor and controller is used. A set point of -300 millivolts is adequate for most applications. As you become more familiar with the system, you may want to increase (become more negative) the set point in 25-milli-volt increments and check the validity of the setting. There are several suppliers of colorimetric testing kits for hexavalent chrome (sample turns purple if hexavalent chrome is present) that can be used to determine the best ORP set point; -400 millivolts is the maximum set point that most have found to be acceptable, but each wastestream needs to be evaluated.
Alternative technologies for chrome reduction include sulfur dioxide gas, sodium hydrosulfite, ferrous sulfate, scrap iron/steel/steel wool and electrochemical.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 9th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the ninth quarter of work (January-March 2023). In this report, we describe our work on evaluating the performance of PFAS degradation by electrooxidation using surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes in batch mode.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #121: Development of a Sustainability Metrics System and a Technical Solution Method for Sustainable Metal Finishing - 15th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the twelfth quarter of project work (October-December 2023) at Wayne State University in Detroit. In this period, our main effort focused on the development of a set of Digital Twins (DTs) using the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) technology with application on parts rinsing simulation.
