Correction: Non-Electrolytically Applied Zinc Coat
My response in the February issue regarding General Motors specification GMW 3359 for non-electrolytically applied zinc-rich coatings was incorrect. Here is the correct answer.
My response in the February issue regarding General Motors specification GMW 3359 for non-electrolytically applied zinc-rich coatings was incorrect. Here is the correct answer:
Using a non-electrolytic process greatly reduces problems associated with hydrogen embrittlement of steel components. This specification discusses the application of zinc-rich solvent or water-based coatings, typically using spray or dip-spin processes. The standard is available for a fee from engineers.ihs.com.
The dip-spin process is good for small parts and is conceptually simple. Parts are loaded into a suitable carrier, dipped into a solution and then spun at high speed to ensure that all of the components in the container are coated. The typical process sequence is: cleaning and pretreatment, coating application and oven curing, then a second coating and oven curing, if needed.
Related Content
-
3 Tests to Ensure Parts are Clean Prior to Plating
Making sure that all of the pre-processing fluids are removed prior to plating is not as simple as it seems. Rich Held of Haviland Products outlines three tests that can help verify that your parts are clean.
-
How to Choose Between Sulfate and Chloride-Based Trivalent Chromium
There are several factors to consider when choosing between sulfate and chloride-based baths for trivalent chromium plating. Mark Schario of Columbia Chemical discusses the differences and what platers should keep in mind when evaluating options.
-
Successful South African Plater Beating the Odds
Remaining focused on quality and reliability, Team Plating Works stays profitable in a volatile and challenging economy.
