3/30/2012 | 1 MINUTE READ

NASF Says EPA Chromium Air Rules Have Major Flaws

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Claims EPA Used Data from 'Phantom Facilities'

 

 

 

�
 
 
The NASF has submitted a 100-page package of comments to the U.S. EPA in response to the agency's proposed rule for chromium finishing operations. In it, the association questions the agency's decision to tighten tough regulations even further when the industry has reduced emissions by 99.9 percent since 1995.
 
Christian Richter and Jeff Hannapel, who lead the NASF's Government Affairs office in Washington DC, say their comments also point to major flaws in EPA data and analysis, and raise concerns over EPA's approach to the rule that -- if left unchallenged -- will pose problems for the broader finishing indusutry in the future.
 
"Unfortunately, EPA's analysis has dramatically overestimated both emissions and potential risks from the industry," said Jeff Hannapel, NASF Government Affairs. 
 
"This is not a favorable precedent - the actual data we've received from NASF members across the U.S. show that EPA counted emissions incorrectly - a majority of companies shown as emitters on the agency's list either don't exist, don't do chromium or have actual emissions far below EPA's "models" driving the new regulation," said Hannapel.
 
To see the executive summary and NASF's complete set of comments, please visit www.nasf.org.
 
NASF Government Affairs is still collecting company emissions data, and needs the industry's help to present a complete picture to the agency and the White House on U.S. chromium finishing emissions. They are asking job shops if their company's chromium emissions profile accurately represented in EPA's database.  Please contact Government Affairs at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com or crichter@thepolicygroup.com
 
The proposed rules will be discussed at the NASF's Washington Forum, April 24-26.  Register today for the 2012 Washington Forum or contact Cheryl Clark at cclark@nasf.org.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Coating Thickness Measurement: The Fundamentals

    A review of available test methods, common applications and innovative instrumentation...

  • The Importance of Particle Size in Liquid Coatings

    Coating problems and solutions associated with particle size reduction...

  • Masking for Surface Finishing

    Masking is employed in most any metal finishing operation where only a specifically defined area of the surface of a part must be exposed to a process. Conversely, masking may be employed on a surface where treatment is either not required or must be avoided. This article covers the many aspects of masking for metal finishing, including applications, methods and the various types of masking employed.


Resources